4.5 Article

Brain-gut-microbiota axis: challenges for translation in psychiatry

期刊

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 26, 期 5, 页码 366-372

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.02.008

关键词

Gut microbiota; Brain-gut axis; Depression; Inflammation; Psychobiotics

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [SFI/12/RC/2273]
  2. Health Research Board (HRB) through Health Research Awards [HRA_POR/2011/23, HRA_POR/2012/32, HRA-POR-2-14-647]
  3. EU GRANT [613979, MYNEWGUT FP7-KBBE-2013-7]
  4. NARSAD Young Investigator Grant from Brain and Behavior Research Foundation [20771]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The accruing data linking the gut microbiome to the development and function of the central nervous system has been proposed as a paradigm shift in neuroscience. The gut microbiota can communicate with the brain via neuroimmune, neuroendocrine, and neural pathways comprising the brain-gut-microbiota axis. Dysfunctional neuroimmune pathways are implicated in stress-related psychiatric disorders. Methods: Using depression as our primary example, we review both the preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the possible role played by the gut microbiota in stress-related psychiatric disorders. We consider how this can inform future treatment strategies and outline the challenges and necessary studies for moving the field forward. Results: The role played by the gut microbiota has not been fully elucidated in psychiatric populations. Although tempting to speculate that psychiatric patients may benefit from therapeutic modulation of the brain-gut-microbiota axis, the translational applications of the results obtained in rodent studies have yet to be demonstrated. Conclusions: Evidence of altered gut microbiota composition and function in psychiatric patients is limited and cannot be regarded as proven. Moreover the efficacy of targeting the gut microbiota has not yet been established, and needs further investigation. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据