4.3 Article

The invariant glutamate of human PrimPol DxE motif is critical for its Mn2+-dependent distinctive activities

期刊

DNA REPAIR
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 65-75

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.03.006

关键词

Primase; Polymerase; Metal cofactor; Catalytic residues; Pre-ternary complex

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [BFU2012 - 3769, BFU2015 - 65880-P]
  2. Spanish Research Council (CSIC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PrimPol is a human primase/polymerase specialized in downstream repriming of stalled forks during both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA replication. Like most primases and polymerases, PrimPol requires divalent metal cations, as Mg2+ or Mn2+, used as cofactors for catalysis. However, little is known about the consequences of using these two metal cofactors in combination, which would be the most physiological scenario during PrimPol-mediated reactions, and the individual contribution of the putative carboxylate residues (Asp(114), Glu(116) and Asp(280)) acting as metal ligands. By site-directed mutagenesis in human PrimPol, we confirmed the catalytic relevance of these three carboxylates, and identified Glu(116) as a relevant enhancer of distinctive PrimPol reactions, which are highly dependent on Mn2+. Herein, we evidenced that PrimPol Glu(116) contributes to error-prone tolerance of 8oxodG more markedly when both Mg2+ and Mn2+ ions are present. Moreover, Glu(116) was important for TLS events mediated by primer/template realignments, and crucial to achieving an optimal primase activity, processes in which Mn2+ is largely preferred. EMSA analysis of PrimPol:ssDNA:dNTP pre-ternary complex indicated a critical role of each metal ligand, and a significant impairment when Glu(116) was changed to a more conventional aspartate. These data suggest that PrimPol active site requires a specific motif A (DxE) to favor the use of Mn2+ ions in order to achieve optimal incoming nucleotide stabilization, especially required during primer synthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据