4.7 Article

Advanced turbidity prediction for operational water supply planning

期刊

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS
卷 119, 期 -, 页码 72-84

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2019.02.009

关键词

Analytics; Water quality; Turbidity prediction

资金

  1. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/P000673/1]
  2. Alan Turing Institute under the EPSRC [EP/N510129/1]
  3. ESRC [1992301] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Turbidity is an optical quality of water caused by suspended solids that give the appearance of 'cloudiness'. While turbidity itself does not directly present a hazard to human health, it can be an indication of poor water quality and mask the presence of parasites such as Cryptosporidium. It is, therefore, a recommendation of the World Health Organisation (WHO) that turbidity should not exceed a level of 1 Nephelometric Turbidity Unit (NTU) before chlorination. For a drinking water supplier, turbidity peaks can be highly disruptive requiring the temporary shutdown of a water treatment works. Such events must be carefully managed to ensure continued supply; to recover the supply deficit, water stores must be depleted or alternative works utilised. Machine learning techniques have been shown to be effective for the modelling of complex environmental systems, often used to help shape environmental policy. We contribute to the literature by adopting such techniques for operational purposes, developing a decision support tool that predicts > 1 NTU turbidity events up to seven days in advance allowing water supply managers to make proactive interventions. We apply a Generalised Linear Model (GLM) and a Random Forest (RF) model for the prediction of > 1 NTU events. AUROC scores of over 0.80 at five of six sites suggest that machine learning techniques are suitable for predicting turbidity peaking events. Furthermore, we find that the RF model can provide a modest performance boost due to its stronger capacity to capture nonlinear interactions in the data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据