4.3 Review

5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) in Organic Synthesis: A Review of its Recent Applications Towards Fine Chemicals

期刊

CURRENT ORGANIC SYNTHESIS
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 583-614

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1570179416666190412164738

关键词

5-Hydroxymethylfurfural; synthetic platform; biomass-derived chemical; organic synthesis; value-added chemicals; multi-step synthesis; methodology

资金

  1. CNRS
  2. UCBL
  3. ANR [ANR-15-CE07-0016]
  4. China Scholarship Council
  5. INSA Lyon
  6. CPE Lyon
  7. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-15-CE07-0016] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) is a biomass-derived platform chemical, which can be produced from carbohydrates. In the past decades, 5-HMF has received tremendous attention because of its wide applications in the production of various value-added chemicals, materials and biofuels. The manufacture and the catalytic conversion of 5-HMF to simple industrially-important bulk chemicals have been well reviewed. However, employing 5-HMF as a building block in organic synthesis has never been summarized exclusively, despite the rapid development in this area. Objective: The aim of this review is to bring a fresh perspective on the use of 5-HMF in organic synthesis, to the exclusion of already well documented conversion of 5-HMF towards relatively simple molecules such as 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid, 2,5-dimethylfuran and so on notably used as monomers or biofuels. Conclusion: As it has been shown throughout this review, 5-HMF has been the object of numerous studies on its use in fine chemical synthesis. Thanks to the presence of different functional groups on this platform chemical, it proved to be an excellent starting material for the preparation of various fine chemicals. The use of this C-6 synthon in novel synthetic routes is appealing, as it allows the incorporation of renewable carbon-sources into the final targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据