4.4 Review

Prediction of infection risk in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biologics: are we any closer to risk stratification?

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 285-292

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000598

关键词

anti-tumour necrosis factor; biologics; infection; rheumatoid arthritis; stratification

资金

  1. NIHR academic clinical lectureship
  2. Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology [21755]
  3. Arthritis Research UK Centre for Genetics and Genomics [21754]
  4. NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
  5. MRC [MR/N00583X/1, MR/K015346/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review There are currently several available biologics for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with similar efficacy in most trials. A major consideration therefore in choosing a biologic, continues to be safety concerns such as infection. Considerable advances have been made in the understanding of biologic safety on a population level; however, how close are we to stratifying risk for individual patients? This review discusses evidence published in the last year, with reference to key previous literature. Recent findings Comparative safety of biologics has been studied in observational cohorts, with a possible increased risk of serious infection in tocilizumab-treated patients compared with etanercept. Rheumatoid arthritis patients on biologics are often on concomitant medications such as steroids and opioids, and the advances in relation to infection are summarized. Pharmacological biomarkers and optimizing existing risk prediction scores may allow better future risk stratification. Summary Improved quantification of personalized benefit: harms would allow better-informed decisions, reduction of infection-associated morbidity as well as direct/indirect costs associated with biologics. Although advances have been made to better understand and predict risk, future studies are likely to require a range of novel data sources and methodologies for the goal of precision medicine to be truly realized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据