4.1 Review

Glucose control in the ICU

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 156-162

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000706

关键词

critical illness; hyperglycemia; hypoglycemia; insulin; intensive care

资金

  1. Research Foundation -Flanders (FWO) [T003617N]
  2. University of Leuven [C24/17/070]
  3. Clinical Research and Education Council of the University Hospitals Leuven
  4. Methusalem program - Flemish government through the university of Leuven [METH14/06]
  5. European Research Council Advanced Grant [ERC-2017-ADG-785809]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Critically ill patients usually develop hyperglycemia, which is associated with adverse outcome. Controversy exists whether the relationship is causal or not. This review summarizes recent evidence regarding glucose control in the ICU. Recent findings Despite promising effects of tight glucose control in pioneer randomized controlled trials, the benefit has not been confirmed in subsequent multicenter studies and one trial found potential harm. This discrepancy could be explained by methodological differences between the trials rather than by a different case mix. Strategies to improve the efficacy and safety of tight glucose control have been developed, including the use of computerized treatment algorithms. Summary The ideal blood glucose target remains unclear and may depend on the context. As compared with tolerating severe hyperglycemia, tight glucose control is well tolerated and effective in patients receiving early parenteral nutrition when provided with a protocol that includes frequent, accurate glucose measurements and avoids large glucose fluctuations. All patient subgroups potentially benefit, with the possible exception of patients with poorly controlled diabetes, who may need less aggressive glucose control. It remains unclear whether tight glucose control is beneficial or not in the absence of early parenteral nutrition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据