4.1 Review

Cutaneous drug hypersensitivity: developments and controversies

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000548

关键词

allergy diagnosis; beta-lactam allergy; clinical manifestations; controversies; cutaneous drug hypersensitivity reaction; severe cutaneous adverse reaction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Cutaneous drug hypersensitivity reactions (CDHRs) are a complicated area with multiple clinical manifestations and differential diagnoses, requiring differentiated diagnostic measurements and optimized therapeutic management. Recent findings Disseminated CDHRs to classical drugs can be classified by a simple algorithm, whereas chemotherapeuticals or biopharmaceuticals may show drug-specific and atypical clinical presentations. Controversies in drug hypersensitivity diagnosis exist about the benefit and accuracy of in-vitro tests. Although skin tests are the best means of detecting sensitization to drugs, methods have not been sufficiently standardized. The necessity for skin tests before performing drug provocation test (DPT) and of prolonged DPTs is discussed in selected patients. If a suspicion has been documented, beta-lactam allergy should be excluded. The standard allergy diagnosis is done by an allergist. In case of urgent need because of an infection and low risk according to history, faster delabeling pathways have been developed. There is weak evidence that patients with mastocytosis may have a slightly increased risk of developing immediate-type drug hypersensitivity; however, if considerations are taken, drugs do not have to be withheld for this patient group. There is particular need for improved diagnostic measurements in patients with drug-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), both identifying the offending drug and detecting individuals at risk. Further challenges encompass appropriate treatments during the acute as well as chronic phase of SCARs. Summary Recent literature has contributed to our understanding of clinical manifestations and existing controversies and future needs in this area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据