4.7 Article

New Insights into Manganese Local Environment in MnS-1 Nanocrystals

期刊

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
卷 19, 期 6, 页码 3130-3138

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.8b01181

关键词

-

资金

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [P1-0021, P1-0112, 730872]
  2. project CALIPSOplus from the EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation HORIZON 2020 [730872]
  3. Helmholtz Association (HGF) [I-20170160 EC]
  4. ELETTRA [20165258]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Manganese plays an important role in redox catalysis using zeolites as inorganic support materials, but the formation of the preferred redox manganese species (framework or extraframework) is still not well understood. Herein, the influence of the amount of manganese together with conventional and microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis paths on the formation of manganese species within the zeolite silicalite-1 (S-1) with MFI structure was investigated. It was found out that both synthesis procedures led to the formation of framework and extraframework manganese species, but in different molar ratios. However, the conventional synthesis procedure with all Mn/Si molar ratios generates more framework Mn in comparison to the microwave procedure. Additionally, the diminution of the zeolite crystals to nanoscale from 100 to 200 nm was achieved via the conventional procedure for the first time. UV-vis, Raman, and X-ray absorption spectroscopic analyses revealed different local environments of manganese: Mn3+ incorporated into the silicalite-1 framework as framework manganese and Mn2+/3+ present as extraframework manganese (Mn2O3, Mn3O4). TEM reveals the presence of Mn3O4 nanorods. Both framework manganese and extraframework manganese exhibit good catalytic activity for styrene epoxidation. Catalytic results suggest that, in oxidation reactions of hydrocarbons, framework manganese is more active at lower Mn contents (Mn/Si < 0.015), whereas extraframework manganese is more active at higher loadings (Mn/Si > 0.015).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据