4.4 Article

Effect of Graft Shift Direction on Graft Detachment and Endothelial Cell Survival After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

期刊

CORNEA
卷 38, 期 8, 页码 970-975

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002015

关键词

DMEK; graft shift; graft detachment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To investigate the effects of graft shift orientation on clinical outcomes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Methods: This study used intraoperative video images to retrospectively examine the effect of graft shift direction in 50 eyes of 50 patients. Correlations were assessed between graft shift direction and multiple parameters. Results: The graft detachment rate was higher in eyes with an inferior graft shift than in those without (superior, 0% and 5.0%; nasal, 0% and 20.0%; inferior, 16.7% and 55.0%; temporal, 16.7% and 45.0%; and any segment, 23.3% and 65.0%; for graft shift-negative and graft shift-positive cases, respectively). Postoperative endothelial cell density reduction was higher in eyes with an inferior graft shift (1 month, 23.6% +/- 13.7% and 37.5% +/- 18.8%; 3 months, 31.6% +/- 16.4% and 45.2% +/- 15.2%; and +/- months, 39.8% +/- 14.9% and 50.7% +/- 16.6%; for graft shift-negative and graft shift-positive cases, respectively). Eyes with a superior graft shift had lower postoperative endothelial cell density reduction than those without (1 month, 36.9% +/- 16.6% and 20.0% +/- 13.1%; 3 months, 45.3% +/- 13.3% and 27.4% +/- 16.2%; and +/- months, 51.3% +/- 14.6% and 35.9% +/- 14.5%; for graft shift-negative and graft shift-positive cases, respectively). Graft shift direction did not affect postoperative best-corrected visual acuity or central corneal thickness. Conclusions: Graft shift direction in DMEK, especially inferior graft shift, affected the postoperative graft detachment rate. Superior graft shift had a beneficial effect on postoperative corneal endothelial values. These data suggest that inferior graft shift should be avoided in DMEK.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据