4.7 Article

Effect of specimen thicknesses on water absorption and flexural strength of CFRP laminates subjected to water or alkaline solution immersion

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 208, 期 -, 页码 314-325

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.009

关键词

Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP); Specimen thickness; Durability; Accelerated method; Water uptake; Flexural strength

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0703000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51878120, 51778102]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT18LK35]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province of China [20180550763]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, an experimental research was undertaken to investigate the effect of specimen thicknesses on water absorptions and flexural strengths of wet lay-up CFRP laminates subjected to distilled water or alkaline solution immersion up to 180 days. Test results showed that the water uptake and flexural strength retention of CFRP laminates were significantly affected by the adopted specimen thickness. For the same aging time, the water uptake of CFRP laminates decreased in the early stage of immersion and increased in the later stage of immersion with the increase of specimen thickness. Meanwhile, the flexural strength retention generally increased as specimen thickness increased. In addition, a new thickness-based accelerated method for hygrothermal aging test of CFRP laminates was proposed. The accelerated factors of the water uptake and flexural strength retention of CFRP laminates were theoretically deduced. The proposed analytical model of accelerated factors was verified with current test data, and then applied to predict long-term properties of CFRP laminates. Compared with the traditional temperature-based accelerated method, the new thickness-based accelerated method is much easier to apply to predict long-term properties of CFRP laminates with good accuracy. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据