4.7 Article

Influence of cavity insulation on the fire resistance of light gauge steel framed walls

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 687-710

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.076

关键词

Cavity insulation; Fire resistance; Light gauge steel framed walls; Non-load bearing walls; Load bearing walls

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [LP130101043]
  2. Queensland University of Technology (QUT)
  3. Australian Research Council [LP130101043] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Light gauge steel framed (LSF) walls are used in fire compartmentation to prevent the spread of fire, smoke and toxic gases. The fire behavioural characteristics of non-load bearing LSF walls are different from those of load bearing walls. In non-load bearing LSF walls, fire penetration to the ambient side is to be prevented for insulation and integrity criteria whereas in load bearing walls, steel studs need to be protected from heat for structural adequacy also. This paper investigates the fire resistance of non load bearing and load bearing LSF walls with and without cavity insulation. It presents the details of a series of standard fire tests conducted to investigate the effect of cavity insulation in both load bearing and non-load bearing LSF walls. The use of cavity insulation increased the fire resistance level (FRL) of non-load bearing walls, while it significantly reduced the FRL of load bearing walls. A finite element parametric study was then conducted for LSF walls lined with both single and double layers of plasterboards. Both thermal and structural fire performance results of LSF walls from finite element analyses are presented and compared in this paper. These results showed that FRL of cavity insulated non-load bearing LSF walls increases by 10-20 min, while it is significantly reduced for load bearing LSF walls with load ratios below 0.7. This study highlights both the beneficial and detrimental effects of cavity insulated LSF walls exposed to fire. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据