4.7 Article

Thermally conductive nanostructured, aramid dielectric composite films with boron nitride nanosheets

期刊

COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 175, 期 -, 页码 85-91

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.02.006

关键词

aramid nanofibers; boron nitride nanosheets; thermal conductivity; dielectric

资金

  1. Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project [201704030066]
  2. Guangdong Province Youth Science and Technology Innovation Talents [2014TQ01C781]
  3. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2016B090918074]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, South China University of Technology [2017ZD087]
  5. Guangdong Province Science Foundation for Cultivating National Engineering Research Center for Efficient Utilization of Plant Fibers [2017B090903003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rapid development of modem electronics and high-frequency and high-speed circuits sets stringent requirements of low dielectric permittivity and efficient heat removal of thermal-management materials to reduce the time delay of signal propagation and ensure the long lifetime of the electronics. In this work, we report a novel thermally conductive and minimally dielectric nanocomposite film by vacuum filtering aramid nanofibers (ANFs) on nylon filter with boron nitride nanosheets (BNNSs). To obtain a continuous, uniform, freestanding composite film with both low dielectric permittivity and strong thermal conductivity, ANF suspensions were dialyzed and then absorbed into a BNNSs/Isopropanol (IPA) dispersion by bath-sonication. The advantage of the nanocomposite film lies in that it possesses an out-plane thermal conductivity up to 0.6156 (w.m(-1).k(-1)) at BNNSs mass percent of 50 wt%, a conductivity that is almost 5 times that of the pure nano-aramid film. The nanocomposite film also boasts a low dielectric permittivity (similar to 2.4 at 10(8)Hz)along with excellent mechanical flexibility and strength (similar to 62 MPa).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据