4.7 Article

Influence of high temperature on strength, ultrasonic velocity and mass loss of calcium carbonate whisker reinforced cement paste

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 163, 期 -, 页码 438-446

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.030

关键词

Calcium carbonate whisker; High temperature; Strength; Ultrasonic velocity; Mass loss; Microstructure

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51678111, 51478082, 201606060177]
  2. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calcium carbonate whisker (CW) can reinforce the flexural strength of cement paste and limit the development of micro-cracks at ambient temperature (25 +/- 2 degrees C), but the effect of CW on mechanical properties of cement paste after exposure to high temperatures is still unknown. Therefore, mechanical properties, i.e. flexural strength, compressive strength and splitting tensile strength were measured using CW reinforced cement specimens before and after they were exposed to high temperatures. In addition, performance of CW reinforced cement paste after exposure to high temperatures was studied by ultrasonic test and mass loss test. At last, microstructural analysis (differential thermogravimetric analysis and scanning electron microscopy) were employed to study the deterioration mechanism of temperature and reinforcement mechanism of CW. These experimental results suggested that CW played a significant role in hindering the development of cracks before 600 degrees C. When temperatures increased up to 200 degrees C, the flexural strength decreased. However, the compressive strength and splitting tensile increased. When temperatures varied from 200 degrees C to 400 degrees C, the three strengths reacted differently to the elevated temperatures. Subsequently, the residual strength rapidly decreased up to 1000 degrees C. After that, the three strengths increased slightly. The residual strength, ultrasonic velocity and mass loss were related to the temperatures and CW content and quantitative measurement of these factors was also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据