4.7 Article

A hemocompatible cryoprotectant inspired by freezing-tolerant plants

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 106-114

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.12.053

关键词

Zwitterionic betaine; Cryopreservation; Ultrarapid freezing; Hemocompatibility; Red blood cell

资金

  1. National Natural Science Funds for Innovation Research Groups [21621004]
  2. Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology [QNLM2016ORP0407]
  3. Tianjin Natural Science Foundation [18JCYBJC29500]
  4. National Natural Science Funds for Excellent Young Scholars [21422605]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cryopreservation can extend the storage time of red blood cells (RBCs) for even decades, offering a promising solution to blood waste and shortage caused by routinely used hypothermic preservation method ((similar to)42 days). Currently, organic solvents such as glycerol or dimethyl sulfoxide are the state-of-the-art cryoprotectants (CPAs). However, severe RBC hemolysis induced by solvent CPA removal has raised serious concerns, which has been the bottleneck problem for RBC cryopreservation. Here, inspired by freezing-tolerant plants, we reported a natural zwitterionic betaine-based approach for effective RBC cryopreservation without the need of any organic solvent. Using a time-saving ultrarapid freezing protocol, about 80% of post-thaw RBC integrity rate could be achieved. Most importantly, RBC integrity was not affected during betaine removal, indicating its hemocompatibility. Mechanistically, we presented that betaine could inhibit ice formation and recrystallization during freeze-thaw cycle to protect cells from ice injury; moreover, betaine probably could be promptly taken up and released by cells to prevent them from osmotic injury. This approach provides an attractive solution for long-distance/long-term RBC transport/storage, and may benefit current cryopreservation technologies to support the lifesaving RBC transfusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据