4.4 Article

Optimizing Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate to Support Adult to Pediatric Pharmacokinetic Bridging Studies in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis

期刊

CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS
卷 58, 期 10, 页码 1323-1332

出版社

ADIS INT LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s40262-019-00761-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Michigan College of Pharmacy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is often used to model drug clearance (CL) and scale doses across age and body size. Over their lifetime, patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) receive repeated courses of tobramycin, an antibiotic with eGFR-dependent CL, for the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations. Tobramycin population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling can be used to decipher the best approach to define eGFR for pediatric bridging studies. Methods Inpatients with CF who received intravenous tobramycin between 1 January 2006 and 30 May 2018 were eligible for inclusion. Encounters without tobramycin concentration measurement or missing covariate data were excluded. Population PK analysis was performed using NONMEM.Covariate models were built following identification of the base model, with specific emphasis on the effect of different methods of estimating renal function as a covariate of tobramycin CL. Results A total of 296 CF patients contributed 1029 care encounters (420 pediatric, 609 adult) and 4352 tobramycin concentrations to this analysis. The median (minimum, maximum) age at encounter was 19 years (0.2, 60), with serum creatinine of 0.60 mg/dL (0.10, 3.41). A two-compartment model best described the observed data, with height and eGFR as significant covariates of tobramycin CL. eGFR was best modeled using a combination of the modified Schwartz and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKDEPI) equations expressed in absolute units. Conclusions The CKDEPI equation bridges PK data generated in adults to adolescents with CF better than the current regulatory standard. The eGFR should be expressed in absolute units (mL/min) for PK analyses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据