4.7 Article

NRG1 Gene Fusions Are Recurrent, Clinically Actionable Gene Rearrangements in KRAS Wild-Type Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 15, 页码 4674-4681

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0191

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. BC Cancer Foundation
  2. Genome British Columbia
  3. Genome British Columbia [202SEQ, 212SEQ, 12002, B20POG]
  4. Canada Foundation for Innovation [20070, 30198, 30981, 33408]
  5. Terry Fox Research Institute
  6. Pancreatic Cancer Canada
  7. Canada Research Chairs program
  8. CIHR Foundation) program [FDN-143288]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Gene fusions involving neuregulin 1 (NRG1) have been noted in multiple cancer types and have potential therapeutic implications. Although varying results have been reported in other cancer types, the efficacy of the HER-family kinase inhibitor afatinib in the treatment of NRG1 fusionpositive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is not fully understood. Experimental Design: Forty-seven patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma received comprehensive wholegenome and transcriptome sequencing and analysis. Two patients with gene fusions involving NRG1 received afatinib treatment, with response measured by pretreatment and posttreatment PET/CT imaging. Results: Three of 47 (6%) patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were identified as KRAS wild type by whole-genome sequencing. All KRAS wild-type tumors were positive for gene fusions involving the ERBB3 ligand NRG1. Two of 3 patients with NRG1 fusion-positive tumors were treated with afatinib and demonstrated a significant and rapid response while on therapy. Conclusions: This work adds to a growing body of evidence that NRG1 gene fusions are recurrent, therapeutically actionable genomic events in pancreatic cancers. Based on the clinical outcomes described here, patients with KRAS wildtype tumors harboring NRG1 gene fusions may benefit from treatment with afatinib.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据