4.7 Article

Plants mediate precipitation-driven transport of a neonicotinoid pesticide

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 222, 期 -, 页码 445-452

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.150

关键词

Insecticide; Preferential flow; Evapotranspiration; Seed-coated neonicotinoid

资金

  1. Virginia Tech Institute of Critical Science and Applied Technology [RDS628034650]
  2. Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station
  3. Hatch Program of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture [VA-160041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neonicotinoid insecticides provide crop protection via water solubility and systemicity, yet these chemical characteristics, combined with high toxicity to non-target invertebrates (e.g., honeybees), elicit concern of environmental transport. Neonicotinoids have been detected in soil and surface water throughout North America; however, no investigation has defined a direct connection to planted seed dressings. We quantified the physical transport of thiamethoxam (TMX), a neonicotinoid, under field conditions. We planted TMX-coated corn seeds and maintained plots with and without viable crops (n = 3 plots per treatment) to determine plant influence on pesticide transport. TMX concentrations were measured in soil and drainage throughout the growing season. Storm-generated runoff was the dominant transport mechanism (maximum TMX concentration 1.72 +/- 0.605 mu g L-1; no viable plants), followed by shallow (<72 cm) lateral drainage (0.570 +/- 0.170 mu g L-1; no viable plants), and deep (110 cm) drainage (0.170 +/- 0.265 mu g L-1; viable plants). Soil samples confirmed vertical and lateral movement within 23 and 36 days of planting, respectively. Plants facilitated downward migration of TMX in soil but restricted TMX drainage. Altogether, these study results revealed that neonicotinoids can be transported from seed coatings both above and through the soil profile, which may enable migration into surrounding ecosystems. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据