4.7 Article

Degradation of 2, 2-Dichlorovinyl dimethyl phosphate (dichlorvos) through the rhizosphere interaction between Panicum maximum Jacq and some selected fungi

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 221, 期 -, 页码 403-411

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.058

关键词

Fungi; Plant; Spent mushroom compost; Dichlorvos; Gene expression; Degradation rate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

7 Many fungi have been reported to enhance the plant responses and degradation of several persistent pollutants in soils. In this study, five dominant fungi strains were identified from a pesticides polluted soil in Nigeria and screened for the expression of phosphoesterase (opd and mpd) and catechol 1, 2-dioxygenase (afk2 and afk4) genes using Reverse Transcriptase-PCR technique. Their rhizosphere interaction with plant (Panicum maximum) was further studied for the degradation of 2, 2 Dichlorovinyl dimethyl phosphate (dichlorvos). Fungal strains were mixed with Spent Mushroom Compost (SMC) of Pleurotus ostreatus in 1:100 w/w and then applied to a sterilized pesticide polluted soil (5 kg) at increasing concentrations of 10, 20, 30 and 40% with two controls (plant only and fungi-SMC mixture only). Degradation efficiency (DE), degradation rate (K-1) and half-life (t(1/2)) of dichlorvos was calculated in each treatment after 90-day of planting. All the strains were registered at NCBI gene-bank with accession numbers KY693969, KY488464, KY488465, KY693971 and KY693972: they all possess the tested genes although mpd and opd were over-expressed in all the strains while afk2 and ajk4 were moderately expressed. The plant-fungi-SMC interaction synergistically sped-up dichlorvos degradation rate in less time period, appreciable loss of dichlorvos at 72.23 and 82.70% DE were observed in 30 and 40% treatments respectively as compared to controls 1 and 2 having 62.20 +/- 3.07 and 6233 +/- 4.69% DE respectively. In the same way, the 40% treatment gave the best k(1) and t(1/2) of 1.755 and 0.40 +/- 0.02/day respectively. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据