4.8 Article

Theoretical Prediction and Experimental Evaluation of Topological Landscape and Thermodynamic Stability of a Fluorinated Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 31, 期 10, 页码 3777-3783

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00994

关键词

-

资金

  1. UK national high-performance computing service, ARCHER
  2. EPSRC [EP/P022561/1]
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  4. Ministere de l'Economie, de la Science et de l'Innovation du Quebec (MESI)
  5. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec, Nature et Technologies (FRQNT)
  6. NSERC [RGPIN-2017-06467]
  7. NSERC E. W. R Steacie Memorial Fellowship [SMFSU 507347-17]
  8. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science [DE-SC0016573]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prediction of topological preferences and polymorph stability remains a challenge for the design of metal-organic frameworks exhibiting a rich topological landscape, such as zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs). Here, we have used mechanochemical screening and calorimetry to test the ability of dispersion-corrected periodic density functional theory (DFT) to accurately survey the topological landscape, as well as quantitatively evaluate polymorph stability, for a previously not synthesized ZIF composition. Theoretical calculations were used to obtain an energy ranking and evaluate energy differences for a set of hypothetical, topologically distinct structures of a fluorine-substituted ZIF. Calculations were then experimentally validated via mechanochemical screening and calorimetry, which confirmed two out of three theoretically anticipated topologies, including a fluorinated analogue of the popular ZIF-8, while revealing an excellent match between the measured and theoretically calculated energetic differences between them. The results, which speak strongly in favor of the ability of dispersion-corrected periodic DFT to predict the topological landscape of new ZIFs, also reveal the ability to use peripheral substituents on the organic linker to modify the framework thermodynamic stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据