4.5 Article

Liquid-Phase Laser Induced Forward Transfer for Complex Organic Inks and Tissue Engineering

期刊

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 45, 期 1, 页码 84-99

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-016-1617-3

关键词

Laser induced forward transfer; Cell printing; Regenerative medicine; Tissue engineering

资金

  1. Directorate For Engineering
  2. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1445727] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh [1612937] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Laser induced forward transfer (LIFT) acts as a novel alternative to incumbent plotting techniques such as inkjet printing due to its ability to precisely deposit and position picoliter-sized droplets while being gentle enough to preserve sensitive structures within the ink. Materials as simple as screen printing ink to complex eukaryotic cells have been printed with applications spanning from microelectronics to tissue engineering. Biotechnology can benefit from this technique due to the efficient use of low volumes of reagent and the compatibility with a wide range of rheological properties. In addition, LIFT can be performed in a simple lab environment, not requiring vacuum or other extreme conditions. Although the basic apparatus is simple, many strategies exist to optimize the performance considering the ink and the desired pattern. The basic mechanism is similar between studies so the large number of variants can be summarized into a couple of categories and reported on with respect to their specific applications. In particular, precise and gentle deposition of complex molecules and eukaryotic cells represent the unique abilities of this technology. LIFT has demonstrated not only marked improvements in the quality of sensors and related medical devices over those manufactured with incumbent technologies but also great applicability in tissue engineering due to the high viability of printed cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据