4.5 Article

Benzo[a]pyrene Induction of Glutathione S-Transferases: An Activity-Based Protein Profiling Investigation

期刊

CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY
卷 32, 期 6, 页码 1259-1267

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00069

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [P42 ES016465]
  2. NIH NIGMS Research Resource for Integrative Biology [P41 GM103493]
  3. Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  4. U.S. DOE [DE-AC06-76RL01830]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are ubiquitous environmental contaminants generated from combustion of carbon-based matter. Upon ingestion, these molecules can be bioactivated by cytochrome P450 monooxygenases to oxidized toxic metabolites. Some of these metabolites are potent carcinogens that can form irreversible adducts with DNA and other biological macromolecules. Conjugative enzymes, such as glutathione Stransferases or UDP-glucuronosyltransferases, are responsible for the detoxification and/or facilitate the elimination of these carcinogens. While responses to PAH exposures have been extensively studied for the bioactivating cytochrome P450enzymes, much less is known regarding the response of glutathione S-transferases in mammalian systems. In this study, we investigated the expression and activity responses of murine hepatic glutathione S-transferases to benzo[a]pyrene exposure using global proteomics and activity-based protein profiling for chemoproteomics, respectively. Using this approach, we identified several enzymes exhibiting increased activity including GSTA2, M1, M2, M4, M6, and P1. The activity of one GST enzyme, GSTA4, was found to be downregulated with increasing B[a]P dose. Activity responses of several of these enzymes were identified as being expression-independent when comparing global and activity-based data sets, possibly alluding to as of yet unknown regulatory post-translational mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据