4.7 Article

Fabrication of ZnCoS nanomaterial for high energy flexible asymmetric supercapacitors

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 374, 期 -, 页码 347-358

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.181

关键词

ZnCoS, Chemical precipitation; Ion exchange; Anode; Supercapacitors; Flexible ASC device

资金

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  2. University of Lille
  3. Hauts-de-France region
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51701240]
  5. Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province [2017GGX20123]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [19CX05001A]
  7. Chinese government for the China Scholarship Council Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bimetal sulfides as anode electrode materials have attracted extensive attention owing to their superior electrochemical activity compared to their mono-metal sulfide counterparts. Herein, ZnCoS nanomaterial was synthesized by chemical precipitation and ion-exchange process. The obtained ZnCoS can be considered as the product of partial substitution of Zn2+ by Co2+ and/or Co3+ ions in the ZnS lattice. Benefiting from the synergistic effects, the ZnCoS was evaluated as electrode material for supercapacitors. By varying the preparation conditions, we found that the ZnCoS material synthesized using an initial mole ratio of Co/Zn = 2 at 50 degrees C gave the best performance with a maximum specific capacitance of 1134.7 F g(-1) at 1 A g(-1), which is about 7.7 times that of bare ZnS electrode material. Furthermore, this electrode material exhibits good rate capability (81% retention from 1 to 20 A g(-1)) and excellent cycling stability with no obvious specific capacitance decrease at 20 A g(-1) after 6000 charging-discharging cycles. A fabricated flexible asymmetric supercapacitor, consisting of ZnCoS and porous reduced graphene oxide, displays a maximum specific capacitance of about 90 F g(-1) at 10 mV s(-1) with an energy density of 17.7 Wh kg(-1) at a power density of 435 W kg(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据