4.7 Review

Modification, application and reaction mechanisms of nano-sized iron sulfide particles for pollutant removal from soil and water: A review

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 362, 期 -, 页码 144-159

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.12.175

关键词

Iron sulfide; Nanoparticles; Soil remediation; Water contamination

资金

  1. Science and Technology Program of Hunan Province [2016SK2045]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51378190, 51521006, 51578222, 51579094]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [13JJB002]
  4. Research Foundation of Education Department of Hunan Province [17K019, 17C0305]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of excessive pollutants in soil and water caused by the fast development of industry has been a challenge for the innovation of environmental remediation technologies. Nano-sized iron sulfide (FeS) particles have aroused researchers' attention for environmental remediation over the decade owing to their high reactivity and large specific surface area. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review on the evolution of FeS nanoparticles for environmental decontamination. The synthesis for bare nano-sized FeS particles via physicochemical and biological methods, the modification for nano-sized FeS particles by coating stabilizers and loading supporting materials are described in this review. What's more, the applications of nano-scale FeS in soil and water remediation are also discussed, including the removal of halogenated hydrocarbon, radionuclide, heavy metals, and metalloid. Meanwhile, the interaction mechanisms, namely adsorption and redox reaction between contaminants and nano-sized FeS and the effect of remediation conditions have been summarized in this review. Moreover, some future research needs are also stated such as researching the fate of FeS nanoparticle after injecting into soil and water, enhancing the mobility of nano-sized FeS in soil and water, and measuring the toxicity to the organisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据