4.7 Article

Hydroxylamine enhanced degradation of naproxen in Cu2+ activated peroxymonosulfate system at acidic condition: Efficiency, mechanisms and pathway

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 361, 期 -, 页码 764-772

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.12.114

关键词

Sulfate radical; Hydroxyl radical; Naproxen; Copper cycle; Hydroxylamine; Peroxymonosulfate

资金

  1. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2017ZX07201003-03]
  2. Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant, China [2018M641836]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peroxymonosulfate (PMS) activated by Cu+ has been regarded as an effective activation method to generate sulfate radical and hydroxyl radical, however, this process is limited for the poor reduction of Cu2+ to Cu+ by PMS. In this study, hydroxylamine (HAm) was introduced to improve the oxidation capacity of Cu2+/PMS process, meanwhile the degradation efficiency of naproxen (NPX) in Cu2+/HAm/PMS system was investigated for the first time. It was found that HAm could accelerate the redox cycle of Cu2+/Cu+, leading to an enhancement on NPX degradation. The NPX degradation efficiency in Cu2+/HAm/PMS system was 10 times and 2 times of that in Cu2+/PMS and HAm/PMS in 5 min at pH 4.0. The analysis of steady-state concentration of Cu species showed that HAm could enhance the transformation of Cu2+ to Cu+, leading to an improvement on NPX degradation in Cu2+/HAm/PMS system. Both sulfate radical and hydroxyl radical were identified as the dominant reactive species by indirect and direct methods, and PMS activation was attributed to the formation of Cu+ proved by neocuproine experiments. Eight degradation products of NPX were identified by LC-MS/MS, and four oxidation pathways were proposed. This study gives a preliminary interpretation on the enhancement of NPX degradation in Cu2+/HAm/PMS system under the acidic condition, and broadens the scope of HAm enhanced Cu-catalyzed PMS system for the treatment of organic contaminants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据