4.7 Article

UV photolysis of tetrachloro-p-benzoquinone (TCBQ) in aqueous solution: Mechanistic insight from quantum chemical calculations

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 361, 期 -, 页码 812-819

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.12.132

关键词

Tetrachloro-p-benzoquinone; UV irradiation; Dechlorination; Quantum chemical calculations

资金

  1. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment (HIT) [2016DX04, 2016DX13]
  2. HIT Environment and Ecology Innovation Special Funds [HSCJ201605]
  3. Open Projects of Key Laboratory of Polyoxometalate Science of Ministry of Education (NENU)
  4. State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials (JLU) [SKLSSM201723]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, a systematical investigation on the transformation of tetrachloro-p-benzoquinone (TCBQ) under UV irradiation (at 253.7 nm) in aqueous solution has been conducted through quantum chemical calculations. The UV irradiation at 253.7 nm could induce the excitation of TCBQ to its first excited singlet state, followed by the intersystem crossing to its first triplet state. In aqueous solution, the first triplet state of TCBQ was thermodynamically and kinetically feasible to react with H2O via 1,4-addition, where the addition of OH-to the alpha-beta conjugated system was the dominant step. Interestingly, with the addition of hydroxyl to TCBQ, the dechlorination of TCBQ occurred with the formation of the monohydroxylated product of TCBQ (OH-TriCBQ). The UV photolysis pathway of OH-TriCBQ was similar to that of TCBQ, and the 1,4-addition of OH-to the orthoposition of the hydroxyl was the most efficient pathway. The dechlorination by 1,4-addition of OH-was also observed for OH-TriCBQ. With much larger forward energy barriers, the nucleophilic addition of carbonyl by OH-(i. e., 1,2-addition) might be less important for the UV photolysis of TCBQ and OH-TriCBQ. The findings in the present study may help to understand the transformation of TCBQ in aqueous solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据