4.6 Article

Catalytic Activation of Esterases by PEGylation for Polyester Synthesis

期刊

CHEMCATCHEM
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 2490-2499

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201900451

关键词

PEGylation; esterases; activity; catalysis; polyester

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) - European Regional Development Fund [UID/BIO/04469/2019, NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004]
  2. FCT [SFRH/BD/121673/2016, SFRH/BD/114684/2016, SFRH/BPD/98388/2013, SFRH/IF/00186/2015]
  3. European Union through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under the Competitiveness Operational Program [POC-A1.1.4-E-2015, 30/01.09.2016]
  4. Project Search-ON2: Revitalization of HPC infrastructure of UMinho [NORTE-07-0162-FEDER-000086]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/114684/2016] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work we explored PEGylation as an efficient strategy to improve esterase's catalytic performance. For this, we PEGylated three esterases, namely lipase from Candida antarctica B (CALB), lipase from Thermomyces lanuginosus (TL) and cutinase from Fusarium solani pisi (CUT) and evaluated their catalytic performance by using the biosynthesis of poly(ethylene glutarate) as model reaction. After PEGylation with a 5 kDa aldehyde-PEG, CALB and cutinase revealed an increase of activity against pnitrophenyl butyrate hydrolysis (2-fold of increase for CALB and 4-fold of increase for cutinase). Unmodified and PEGylated lipase TL displayed however similar activity results. The polymerase activity of native and PEGylated esterases was also assessed. The data revealed a higher polymerase activity for the lipase TL and cutinase PEGylated forms (88% conversion for PEG-lipase TL and 34% for PEG-cutinase). Molecular dynamics were used to evaluate the effect of PEG on the geometry of the active site of enzymes with lid domain (TL and CALB). These studies corroborate the experimental data revealing a more open active site cavity for the PEGylated catalysts facilitating the catalysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据