4.7 Article

Effect of manipulated precipitation during the growing season on soil respiration in the desert-grasslands in Inner Mongolia, China

期刊

CATENA
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 73-80

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2019.01.010

关键词

Soil carbon flux; Soil carbon; Biomass; Precipitation gradient; Desert-grasslands

资金

  1. National Basic Investigation Project [2017FY100206]
  2. National Key Research and Development Plan of China [2016YFC0500506]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dynamics of soil respiration are crucial in understanding carbon cycling and its feedback to climate change. However, little information exists regarding the response of soil respiration to precipitation variation. To examine the response of soil respiration to precipitation variation through biogeochemical regulation, a manipulative field experiment was conducted along a precipitation gradient (-60%, -40%, -20%, CK = natural precipitation, + 20%, +40% and +60%) in a native desert grassland ecosystem in Inner Mongolia. Plant biomass, total soil carbon and soil respiration were determined across the precipitation treatments during the growing season (from late May to early October) in 2017. Above-ground biomass tended to increase but total soil carbon varied little with an increase in precipitation. Soil respiration exhibited a unimodal curve diurnally in all precipitation treatments, peaking between 09:00 and 13:00, but showed irregular patterns seasonally. Both the daily and seasonal average soil respirations increased with an increase in precipitation (diurnal Rs ranged from 0.37 mu mol m(-2)S(-1 )to 0.75 mu mol m(-2)S(-1); seasonal Rs ranged from 0.43 mu mol m(-2)S(-1) to 0.66 mu mol m(-2)S(-1)). Soil respiration was correlated positively with precipitation-induced change in above-ground plant biomass, but was correlated negatively with precipitation-induced change in total soil carbon. It was concluded that carbon released from the soil increases with an increase in precipitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据