4.7 Review

Ceria and its related materials for VOC catalytic combustion: A review

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 356, 期 -, 页码 141-154

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.05.016

关键词

Ceria catalyst; Oxygen storage capacity; Oxygen vacancy; Noble metals; VOC remediation

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry [CTM2017-82335-R]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China/Research Grant Council Joint Research Scheme [N-HKUST626/13]
  3. Research Grants Council/General Research Fund [16307014]
  4. Guangzhou Collaborative Innovation Key Program [201704030074]
  5. EURASIACAT [201704030074]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on unique oxygen storage capacity (OSC), ceria catalysts are widely investigated for remediation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) over the recent decade. It is generally accepted that VOC oxidation on ceria is through Mars-van Krevelen mechanism, where lattice oxygen (O-Lat) reacts with adsorbed VOC molecule, followed by re-oxidation of reduced ceria by replenishing O-Lat from gaseous O-2. Oxygen vacancy and oxygen mobility are the key factors involved that influence the OSC and consequently modify the catalytic performance. Many strategies have been explored in the literature to optimize the materials. For the formation energy of oxygen vacancies varies with crystal orientation, ceria with specific morphologies (i.e., nanorods with (110) and (100)) perform better than the typical ceria catalysts. Beyond that, transition metal cations (e.g., V5+, Zr4+, Cr3+, Mnx+, and Cu2+) can dope or aliovalent substitute into ceria lattice, resulting in more defects and tuning the reactivity. Precious metal nanoparticles (e.g., Au, Pt, Pd, Ru) are known to activate the lattice oxygen at the interface of noble metal and ceria, facilitating the transformation of surface oxygen species and decreasing the light-off temperature. These strategies are also applicable to keep ceria from deactivation when facing chlorinated VOCs (CVOCs) and volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据