4.3 Article

Methods of Evidence-Based Anatomy: a guide to conducting systematic reviews and meta-analysis of anatomical studies

期刊

ANNALS OF ANATOMY-ANATOMISCHER ANZEIGER
卷 205, 期 -, 页码 16-21

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2015.12.002

关键词

Evidence-based anatomy; Methodology; Meta-analysis; Systematic review

资金

  1. Foundation for Polish Science (FNP)
  2. Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College KNOW (Leading National Research Centre) funds
  3. Foundation for Polish Science (FNP)
  4. Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College KNOW (Leading National Research Centre) funds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evidence-Based Anatomy (EBA) is the concept of applying evidence-based principles and research methods to the anatomical sciences. While narrative reviews are common in the anatomical sciences, true systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) are only beginning to grow in popularity. In order to enhance the quality of future EBA studies, and ensure the clinical reliability of their results, a uniform methodology is needed. In this paper, we present a step-by-step methodological guide for performing SRs and MAs of anatomical studies. We address the EBA-specific challenges in each step of the SR and MA process, and discuss methods and strategies to overcome these difficulties. Furthermore, we discuss in detail the statistical methods used in MA of anatomical data, including multi-categorical and single categorical pooled prevalence estimates, as well as pooled means of one group. Lastly, we discuss the major limitations of EBA, including the lack of a proper quality assessment tool for anatomical studies. The methods described in this paper present a uniform road map for future EBA studies. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据