4.7 Article

Redox-responsive chitosan oligosaccharide-SS-Octadecylamine polymeric carrier for efficient anti-Hepatitis B Virus gene therapy

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 212, 期 -, 页码 215-221

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.02.047

关键词

Chitosan oligosaccharide-SS-Octadecylamine; Redox-responsive; 10-23DNAzyme; Anti-Hepatitis B Virus; Gene therapy

资金

  1. Zhejiang provincial natural science foundation-Qing Shan Hu Science & Technology City Union Foundation [LQY19H300001]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [81402862]
  3. hospital pharmacy special research project of Zhejiang Pharmaceutical Association [2018ZYY02]
  4. Zhejiang provincial natural science foundation [LQ15H280005]
  5. Zhejiang Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Program [2016ZA116]
  6. Zhejiang Medical Technology Program [2017178266]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DrzBC and DrzBS (10-23 DNAzyme) could block the expression of HBV e- and s- gene respectively. But the application of 10-23 DNAzyme was limited owing to the lack of appropriate delivery vehicles. Chitosan oligosaccharide-SS-Octadecylamine (CSSO), a redox-responsive nano-sized polymeric carrier, could self-aggregate and bind with DNA by electrostatic interaction at proper mass ratio. Compared with the traditional commercial carrier Lipo2000, CSSO exhibited lower cytotoxicity, efficient cellular uptake by targeting cells, and rapidly DNA released in cytoplasm after escaping from endosomes. Including the same DNA concentration, Lipo2000/(DrzBC or DrzBS) showed maximum inhibitory rate on HBeAg (47.29 +/- 1.86%) and HBsAg (33.58 +/- 0.72%) secretion after 48 h incubation, and then both decreased. In contrast, HBeAg secretion inhibition by CSSO/DrzBC and HBsAg secretion inhibition by CSSO/DrzBS were up to 73.86 +/- 1.77% and 67.80 +/- 2.51% at 48 h, and further increased to 83.83 +/- 2.34% and 76.79 +/- 2.18% at 72 h, respectively. CSSO is a promising redox-responsive polymeric carrier for efficient anti-Hepatitis B Virus gene therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据