4.7 Review

Modulation of NK cells with checkpoint inhibitors in the context of cancer immunotherapy

期刊

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
卷 68, 期 5, 页码 861-870

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-019-02336-6

关键词

NK cells; miRNA; Immunotherapy; Checkpoint blockade; PIVAC 17

资金

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI13/02691, PI16/01615]
  2. Agencia Estatal de Investigacion (Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain) [SAF2013-46161-R, SAF2017-87538-R]
  3. Consejeria de Economia e Infraestructura (Junta de Extremadura) [GR18085, CTS040]
  4. European Regional Development Funds (FEDER) Una manera de hacer Europa
  5. [IB16164]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The incidence of some types of tumours has increased progressively in recent years and is expected to continue growing in the coming years due in part to the aging of the population. The design of new therapies based on natural killer (NK) cells opens new possibilities especially for the treatment of elderly patients who are particularly susceptible to the toxicity of conventional chemotherapy treatments. In recent years, the potential use of NK cells in cancer immunotherapy has been of great interest thanks to advances in the study of NK cell biology. The identification of key points (checkpoints) in the activation of NK cells that can be regulated by monoclonal antibodies has allowed the design of new therapeutic strategies based on NK cells. However, there are still limitations for its use and the first clinical trials blocking KIR inhibitory receptors have shown little efficacy by inhibiting the maturation of NK cells. Blockade of other inhibitory receptors such as TIGIT, TIM3, LAG3 and PD1 may represent novel strategies to increase NK function in cancer patients. Altogether, the identification of NK cell and tumour cell markers of resistance or susceptibility to the action of NK cells will contribute to identifying those patients that will most likely benefit from NK cell-based immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据