4.4 Review

Global nurse shortages-the facts, the impact and action for change

期刊

BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN
卷 130, 期 1, 页码 25-37

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldz014

关键词

nursing; workforce; shortages; labour market supply and demand; scoping review; evidence gap

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Nurses comprise half the global health workforce. A nine million shortage estimated in 2014 is predicted to decrease by two million by 2030 but disproportionality effect regions such as Africa. This scoping review investigated: what is known about current nurse workforces and shortages and what can be done to forestall such shortages? Sources of data: Published documents from international organisations with remits for nursing workforces, published reviews with forward citation and key author searches. Areas of agreement: Addressing nurse shortages requires a data informed, country specific model of the routes of supply and demand. It requires evidence informed policy and resource allocation at national, subnational and organisation levels. Areas of controversy: The definition in law, type of education, levels and scope of practice of nurses varies between countries raising questions of factors and evidence underpinning such variation. Most policy solutions proposed by international bodies draws on data and research about the medical workforce and applies that to nurses, despite the different demographic profile, the work, the career options, the remuneration and the status. Growing points: Demand for nurses is increasing in all countries. Better workforce planning in nursing is crucial to reduce health inequalities and ensure sustainable health systems. Areas timely for developing research: Research is needed on: the nursing workforce in low income countries and in rural and remote areas; on the impact of scope of practice and task-shifting changes; on the impact over time of implementing system wide policies as well as raising the profile of nursing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据