4.5 Article

Optimizing the dose in patients treated with imatinib as first line treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: A cost-effectiveness study

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 85, 期 9, 页码 1994-2001

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13990

关键词

cost-effectiveness; fixed dosing; gastrointestinal stromal tumours; imatinib; therapeutic drug monitoring

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are treated in first line with the oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, imatinib, until progressive disease. With this fixed dosing regimen, only approximately 40% of patients reach adequate plasma levels within the therapeutic index. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a solution to reach plasma levels within the therapeutic index. However, introducing TDM will also increase costs, due to prolonged imatinib use and laboratory costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of TDM in patients with metastatic/unresectable GIST treated with imatinib as a first line treatment, compared with fixed dosing. Methods A survival model was created to simulate progression, mortality and treatment costs over a 5-year time horizon, comparing fixed dosing vs TDM-guided dosing. The outcomes measured were treatments costs, life-years and quality-adjusted life-years. Results Total costs over the 5-year time horizon were estimated to be euro106 994.85 and euro150 477.08 for fixed dosing vs TDM-guided dosing, respectively. A quality-adjusted life year gain of 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.66-0.90) was estimated with TDM-guided dosing compared to fixed dosing. An average incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of euro58 785.70 per quality-adjusted life year gained was found, mainly caused by longer use and higher dosages of imatinib. Conclusion Based on the currently available data, this analysis suggests that TDM-guided dosing may be a cost-effective intervention for patients with metastatic/unresectable GIST treated with imatinib which will be improved when imatinib losses its patency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据