4.2 Article

High-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer: The impact of cellular repair and source decay

期刊

BRACHYTHERAPY
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 701-710

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.04.005

关键词

High-dose-rate brachytherapy; High-dose-rate brachytherapy monotherapy; Prostate cancer fractionation schemes; Intrafraction repair; Dose protraction; Biological effective dose calculations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: This work quantifies the influence of intrafraction DNA damage repair and cellular repopulation on biologically effective dose (BED) in Ir-192 high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. In addition, it examines the effect of source-decay-induced BED variation for patients treated at different time points in a source exchange cycle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Current fractionation schemes are based on simplified-form BED = nd(1 + d/(alpha/beta)), which assumes that intrafraction repair, interfraction repair, and repopulation are negligible. We took accepted radiobiological parameters of T-k, T-p, and alpha from the recommendations of the AAPM TG-137, and recalculated the full-form BED. Fraction times were normalized to require 15 min for 20 Gy at 10 Ci. Calculations were carried out for both alpha/beta = 1.5 and 3 Gy. RESULTS: After accounting for intrafraction repair, interfraction repair, and/or repopulation, full-form BED calculations showed significant values, as compared with simplified-form BED. For 1-fraction 20 Gy fractionation, the full-form BED was only 64-82% of the simplified-form BED. Dose protraction effects were milder for smaller prescriptions (6 Gy/Fx), where full form was 87-94%. With regard to source decay, BED varied >20% for patients treated at the beginning and the end of a source exchange cycle for 20 Gy single-fraction prescription. CONCLUSIONS: Repair and repopulation can be significant in monotherapy high-dose-rate for prostate cancer. As fractionation schemes are established, the simplified BED calculation may not be appropriate. Investigators should consider evaluating BED as a range rather than a discrete value when presenting results unless source activity is explicitly incorporated as well. (C) 2019 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据