4.6 Article

Cancer cell lipid class homeostasis is altered under nutrient-deprivation but stable under hypoxia

期刊

BMC CANCER
卷 19, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5733-y

关键词

Tumor metabolism; Fatty acid metabolism; Lipidomic profile; Metabolic stress

类别

资金

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Georg Forster Research Fellowship for Experienced Researchers)
  2. National Research Program for Universities of the Higher Education Commission Pakistan [2505/RD/11-2670]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundCancer cells modify the balance between fatty acid (FA) synthesis and uptake under metabolic stress, induced by oxygen/nutrient deprivation. These modifications were shown to alter the levels of individual triglyceride (TG) or phospholipid sub-species. To attain a holistic overview of the lipidomic profiles of cancer cells under stress we performed a broad lipidomic assay, comprising 244 lipids from six major classes. This assay allowed us to perform robust analyses and assess the changes in averages of broader lipid-classes, stratified on the basis of saturation index of their fatty-acyl side chains.MethodsGlobal lipidomic profiling using Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry was performed to assess lipidomic profiles of biologically diverse cancer cell lines cultivated under metabolically stressed conditions.ResultsNeutral lipid compositions were markedly modified under serum-deprived conditions and, strikingly, the cellular level of triglyceride subspecies decreased with increasing number of double bonds in their fatty acyl chains. In contrast and unexpectedly, no robust changes were observed in lipidomic profiles of hypoxic (2% O-2) cancer cells despite concurrent changes in proliferation rates and metabolic gene expression.ConclusionsSerum-deprivation significantly affects lipidomic profiles of cancer cells. Although, the levels of individual lipid moieties alter under hypoxia (2% O-2), the robust averages of broader lipid classes remain unchanged.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据