4.6 Article

Polymorphisms in IL-10 and TGF- gene promoter are associated with lower risk to gastric cancer in a Mexican population

期刊

BMC CANCER
卷 19, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5627-z

关键词

Single nucleotide polymorphism; Cytokines; H; Pylori; Gastric cancer

类别

资金

  1. Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica, Mexico
  2. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (MX) [CONACyT-FONSEC SSA/IMSS/ISSSTE-2008-C01-87701, CONACyT-FONSEC SSA/IMSS/ISSSTE-2014-C01-234191]
  3. CONACyT-Fondo Apoyos complementarios para la adquisicion de equipo cientifico, Mexico [2013-205707]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundHelicobacter pylori infection is recognized as the main risk factor for gastric cancer (GC), the fifth most common neoplasia worldwide. H. pylori interacts with the immune system, disrupting the cytokine network and inducing chronic inflammation. This work aimed to evaluate the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in selected cytokine gene promoters and GC.MethodsThe study included 359 subjects, 125 GC patients, 109 intestinal metaplasia (IM) patients and 125 asymptomatic controls. DNA was extracted from white blood cells and nine SNPs in cytokine gene promoters were genotyped using predesigned 5-endonulease assays. The association of the SNPs with IM and GC was evaluated using multinomial regression models.ResultsBoth genotypes, TC (OR=0.51, 95% CI=0.27-0.98) and TT (OR=0.42, 95% CI=0.20-0.91) in the locus -509 of the TGF- promoter were significantly associated with GC. The TT genotype in the locus -819 of the IL-10 promoter was also significantly associated with GC (OR=0.37, 95% CI=0.17-0.81). No significant association was found with SNPs IL-4 -590T/C (rs1800629), IL-6 -573G/C (rs1800796), IL-10 -592C/A (rs1800872), IL-10 -1082A/G (rs1800896), and, IFN- -1615C/T (rs2069705).ConclusionsSNPs in TGF (-509 C/T, rs1800469) and IL-10 (-819 C/T, rs1800871) promoters were associated with a lower risk for GC in a Mexican population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据