4.3 Article

Aflatoxin-specific monoclonal antibody selection for immunoaffinity column development

期刊

BIOTECHNIQUES
卷 66, 期 6, 页码 261-268

出版社

FUTURE SCI LTD
DOI: 10.2144/btn-2018-0143

关键词

antibody selection; immuno-affinity column; matrix interference; mycotoxin analysis; solvent tolerance

资金

  1. Turkish Scientfic and Research Council (TUBITAK) [110G139, 110G126]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibodies are the basic components of immuno-analytical systems used for detection of a wide range of analytes. Although there are some ground rules for antibody selection, analyte- and assay-specific criteria are the ones that determine the ultimate success of the immunoassays. In this study, we introduced an effective antibody selection procedure for the development of immunoaffinity columns for aflatoxins. The designed scheme puts emphasis on solvent-and matrix-related characterization steps and was used to comparatively evaluate eight monoclonal antibodies. The selected antibody was tolerant to 40% methanol, 20% acetonitrile, 30% acetone and 40% ethanol and did not interact with corn, red pepper or hazelnut extracts. Immunoaffinity columns developed with the selected antibody were validated by 15 independent aflatoxin analysis laboratories. METHOD SUMMARY This article describes a systematic methodology to select the best monoclonal antibody to be used in aflatoxin immunoaffinity columns. The scheme consists of four critical steps. Highly specific antibodies were selected that interact with aflatoxin derivatives but not with other mycotoxins. High tolerance to the solvents used in aflatoxin extraction protocols was assured. The antibodies that interact with food extracts were eliminated. Finally, the antibodies were functionally tested for effective integration to immunoaffinity columns where resin binding efficacy and column performances were evaluated. The developed columns were validated by 15 independent laboratories to show the efficacy of the selection scheme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据