4.8 Article

Label-free electrochemical DNA biosensor for zika virus identification

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 149-155

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.02.018

关键词

DNA biosensor; Thermal evaporation; Label-free; Diagnosis; Zika virus; Dengue virus

资金

  1. CNPq, Brazil [440496/2016-0]
  2. CAPES, Brazil [88881.130763/2016-01, 2013-57062390615]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seventy years after its discovery, the zika virus emerged in Brazil and spread rapidly throughout the Americas, bringing unusual complications such as microcephaly. The World Health Organization classifies zika as the most harmful viral disease today and considers the development of new diagnostic methods for zika and related diseases, such as dengue, urgent. Although there are tests to identify both infections, current diagnostic methods are slow, nonspecific, and costly. This study describes an impedimetric electrochemical DNA biosensor for label free detection of zika virus. Disposable electrodes were fabricated by thermal evaporation on polyethylene terephthalate substrates covered with a nanometric gold layer manufactured in three-contact configurations. The disposable, evaporated electrodes were morphologically characterized by atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The electrode surface was characterized by electroanalytical techniques. Genetic sequences of primers and complementary capture probes were designed based on analysis of the zika and dengue virus genomes. The biosensor used a three-contact electrode to identify DNA sequences in a drop of sample, and for detection of zika virus sequences, it allowed for direct reading of the hybridization event without labeling on disposable electrodes and with a 1.5 h response time. In this system, impedance measurements indicated a limit of detection of 25.0 +/- 1.7 nM. The developed biosensors showed selectivity for zika in the synthetic DNA assays, and therefore, are promising for clinical analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据