4.8 Article

Quench-type electrochemiluminescence immunosensor for detection of amyloid β-protein based on resonance energy transfer from luminol@SnS2-Pd to Cu doped WO3 nanoparticles

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 133, 期 -, 页码 192-198

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.03.035

关键词

Copper doped tungsten trioxide; Electrochemiluminescence; Luminol; Resonance energy transfer; Amyloid beta-protein

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [ZR2017BB030]
  2. National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Project of China [21627809]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21575050, 21777056, 21505051]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A highly efficient quench-type electrochemiluminescence (ECL) immunosensor was proposed for the trace detection of amyloid beta-protein (A beta(1-42)). In this work, tin disulfide nanoflowers (SnS2-NFs) with large specific surface area, favorable catalytic property and chemical stability were prepared and used as substrate material. Taking advantage of the excellent catalytic ability and biocompatibility, palladium nanoparticles (Pd NPs) were in situ reduced on SnS2 NFs to obtain SnS2-Pd. Moreover it could combine with large amounts of luminol and achieve a strong ECL signal output. In addition, copper doped mesoporous tungsten trioxide (Cu:WO3) nanoparticles were selected to quench ECL emission of luminol@SnS2-Pd via resonance energy transfer, where luminol@SnS2-Pd was the donor and Cu:WO3 was the acceptor. On this basis, a quench-type ECL immunosensor was constructed for detection of A beta(1-42). Under optimum conditions, the fabricated ECL immunosensor showed sensitive response to A beta(1-42) concentration from 0.1 pg/mL to 50 ng/mL with a low detection limit of 5.4 fg/mL (S/N = 3). It is expected to be a promising analytical tool for the sensitive detection of A beta(1-42) and other biomarkers with high specificity, good reproducibility and long-term stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据