4.5 Article

Protein Glycation by Glyoxal Promotes Amyloid Formation by Islet Amyloid Polypeptide

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 116, 期 12, 页码 2304-2313

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.05.013

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 105-2133-M-003-014-MY2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein glycation, also known as nonenzymatic glycosylation, is a spontaneous post-translational modification that would change the structure and stability of proteins or hormone peptides. Recent studies have indicated that glycation plays a role in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and neurodegenerative diseases. Over the last two decades, many types of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), formed through the reactions of an amino group of proteins with reducing sugars, have been identified and detected in vivo. However, the effect of glycation on protein aggregation has not been fully investigated. In this study, we aim to elucidate the impact of protein glycation on islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP, also known as amylin) aggregation, which was strongly associated with T2D. We chemically synthesized glycated IAPP (AGE-IAPP) to mimic the consequence of this hormone peptide in a hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) environment. Our data revealed that AGE-IAPP formed amyloid faster than normal IAPP, and higher-molecular-weight AGE-IAPP oligomers were also observed in the early stage of aggregation. Circular dichroism spectra also indicated that AGE-IAPP exhibited faster conformational changes from random coil to its beta-sheet fibrillar states. Moreover, AGE-IAPP can induce normal IAPP to expedite its aggregation process, and its fibrils can also act as templates to promote IAPP aggregation. AGE-IAPP, like normal IAPP, is capable of interacting with synthetic membranes and also exhibits cytotoxicity. Our studies demonstrated that glycation modification of IAPP promotes the amyloidogenic properties of IAPP, and it may play a role in accumulating additional amyloid during T2D progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据