4.7 Article

Structure-activity relationships for unit C pyridyl analogues of the tuberculosis drug bedaquiline

期刊

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 27, 期 7, 页码 1283-1291

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2019.02.025

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA USA [OPP1017459]
  2. U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), Ronald Reagan Building Washington, DC, USA [GHS-A-00-08-00012-00]
  3. U.K. Department for International Development (DFID), London, England
  4. Irish Aid, Limerick, Eire
  5. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1017459] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ATP-synthase inhibitor bedaquiline is effective against drug-resistant tuberculosis but is extremely lipophilic (clogP 7.25) with a very long plasma half-life. Additionally, inhibition of potassium current through the cardiac hERG channel by bedaquiline, is associated with prolongation of the QT interval, necessitating cardiovascular monitoring. Analogues were prepared where the naphthalene C-unit was replaced with substituted pyridines to produce compounds with reduced lipophilicity, anticipating a reduction in half-life. While there was a direct correlation between in vitro inhibitory activity against M. tuberculosis (MIC90) and compound lipophilicity, potency only fell off sharply below a clogP of about 4.0, providing a useful lower bound for analogue design. The bulk of the compounds remained potent inhibitors of the hERG potassium channel, with notable exceptions where IC50 values were at least 5-fold higher than that of bedaquiline. Many of the compounds had desirably higher rates of clearance than bedaquiline, but this was associated with lower plasma exposures in mice, and similar or higher MICs resulted in lower AUC/MIC ratios than bedaquiline for most compounds. The two compounds with lower potency against hERG exhibited similar clearance to bedaquiline and excellent efficacy in vivo, suggesting further exploration of C-ring pyridyls is worthwhile.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据