4.7 Article

Highly Transparent Nanocomposites Based on Poly(vinyl alcohol) and Sulfated UV-Absorbing Wood Nanofibers

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 2413-2420

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.9b00427

关键词

-

资金

  1. Council of Oulu Region
  2. European Regional Development Fund of the European Union

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Unbleached lignocellulose fibers were studied for the fabrication of wood-based UV-absorbing nanofibers and were used to produce transparent nanocomposites. Groundwood pulp (GWP) and sawdust were selected as raw materials thanks to their low processing degree of fibers and abundant availability as a low-value industrial side stream. Both materials were first sulfated using a reactive deep eutectic solvent. The sulfated wood and sawdust nanofibers (SWNFs and SSDNFs, respectively) were fabricated using a mild mechanical disintegration approach. As a reference material, sulfated cellulose nanofibers (SCNFs) were obtained from bleached cellulose pulp. Our results showed that both GWP and sawdust exhibited similar reactivity compared with bleached cellulose pulp, whereas the yields of sulfated lignin-containing pulps were notably higher. The diameters of both SWNFs and SSDNFs were approximately 3 nm, which was similar to those of the SCNFs. When 10 wt % of lignin-containing nanofibers were mixed together with poly(vinyl alcohol), the fabrication of nanocomposites with only a minimal decrease in transparency in the visible light spectrum was achieved. Transmission in the UV region, on the other hand, was significantly reduced by SWNFs and SSDNFs, whereas SCNFs had only a minor UV-absorbing property. Although the reinforcing effect of lignin-containing nanofibers was lower compared with that of SCNFs, it was comparable with those of other UV-absorbing additives reported in the literature. Overall, the wood-based UV-absorbing nanofibers could have a valuable use in optical applications such as lenses and optoelectronics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据