4.0 Article

Quercetin mitigates anxiety-like behavior and normalizes hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis function in a mouse model of mild traumatic brain injury

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 30, 期 2-3, 页码 282-289

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000480

关键词

adrenocorticotropic hormone; anxiety; brain injury; depression; hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis; mouse; quercetin

资金

  1. Drug Applied Research Center at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences [GN94/77]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a major public health risk for developing anxiety-related disorders and hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis dysregulation in humans. Extensive research has shown that dietary intake or supplementation of the natural flavonoid quercetin might be useful for treating anxiety-related symptoms. The objectives of this study were to determine whether quercetin treatment can attenuate anxiogenic-like behaviors and normalize HPA axis function in mice with mTBI. Animals subjected to mTBI were treated daily with quercetin (50mg/kg) or diazepam (positive control, 3mg/kg) for 14 days. Four behavioral tests (open field, plus maze, light-dark box, and zero maze) were used to assess anxiety-related behaviors in mice. To evaluate HPA axis function, adrenocorticotropic hormone and corticosterone were measured in the serum of mice after the anxiety tests. Quercetin treatment was found to significantly reduce anxiety-like behaviors in mTBI-induced mice. A strength of this study is the consistency of results among anxiety tests. The dysregulation of the HPA axis in mTBI-induced mice treated with quercetin was also attenuated, with decreased levels of adrenocorticotropic hormone and corticosterone. The effects of quercetin were comparable with those of diazepam treatment. Taken together, these results suggest that quercetin might be useful for treating anxiety-related symptoms and HPA axis hyperreactivity in patients with mTBI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据