4.5 Article

Manure application improves both bumblebee flower visitation and crop yield in intensive farmland

期刊

BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY
卷 36, 期 -, 页码 26-33

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2019.03.005

关键词

Agriculture; Bees; Fertiliser regimes; Pollination; Vicia faba

类别

资金

  1. 7th Framework Programme of the European Union (EU) FP7, LIBERATION Project [311781]
  2. Polish Ministry of Science and Education [3406/7]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pollinators provide vital ecosystem services across croplands, yet simultaneously they are influenced by agricultural practices. Nevertheless, only a few studies have explored the potential interactions between soil fertilisers and pollinators. The aim of the current study, which was carried out in Poland in 2015, was to investigate the effect of different fertiliser regimes on bumblebee flower visitation rate and seed yield in crops of the field bean (Vicia faba L.). Our results show that the number of bumblebee visits may be affected by the choice of crop fertiliser. We detected differences in bumblebee number between fertiliser treatments. The organic fertiliser (manure) treatment resulted in the highest bumblebee visitation, although this did not differ significantly from NP, no fertiliser and NK treatments. On the other hand, we observed lower numbers of bumblebees on field bean plots treated with N, NPK, and PK inorganic fertilisers. Manure application also boosted plant height and resulted in a high yield similar to other balanced fertilisers (NPK and PK). Therefore, manure was the only fertiliser that resulted in a high field bean yield and at the same time attracted the main pollinators of the crop. Thus, we suggest that appropriate management practices influence both plant growth and also pollination services and we show that modern agriculture can make compromise between effectiveness and nature conservation. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier GmbH on behalf of Gesellschaft fur Okologie.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据