4.0 Article

Basin-specific effect of global warming on endemic riverine fish in Korea

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/limn/2015024

关键词

Endemic fish; global warming; thermal habitat suitability; species distribution; weighted average regression model; basin scale

资金

  1. National Institute of Environmental Research, Ministry of Environment (Korea)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The differences in geographical setting among basins create variation in regional climate and local assemblages. Global warming might induce varying degree of changes in the biodiversity and distribution of freshwater fish through water temperature increase in each basin. We investigated the effect of global warming on the thermal habitat suitability of endemic riverine fish in the basin scale and the relationship between change in species loss rate and altitude within a basin. Surface air temperature projections based on A1B emission scenario were used to estimate water temperatures in the major basins of South Korea in the future decades. The thermal tolerances of 39 endemic fish species were estimated from water temperatures and abundances in the habitats using the weighted average regression model. The minimum water temperature was compared with the maximum thermal tolerances to simulate the change in thermal habitat suitability of each species in a basin. Global warming is expected to drive 2-20 species to the risk of removal at 4.3-35.5% of their thermal habitats during 2060-2080s. The effect was variable according to the species' thermal tolerances and the level of basin-specific water temperature increase. The correlation between species loss rate and altitude was positive only when the relationship was considered separately for each basin. The results implied that global warming would greatly affect the suitable habitats of endemic fish before 2060s in Korean rivers. It was suggested that the biodiversity conservation efforts needs to incorporate the spatial heterogeneity in thermal regime among the basins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据