4.7 Article

The genome of the freshwater water flea Daphnia magna: A potential use for freshwater molecular ecotoxicology

期刊

AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
卷 210, 期 -, 页码 69-84

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2019.02.009

关键词

Water flea; Daphnia magna; Genome; Defense

资金

  1. Collaborative Genome Program of the Korea Institute of Marine Science and Technology Promotion (KIMST) - Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (MOF) [20180430]
  2. National Research Foundation [2017R1D1A1B03036026]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1D1A1B03036026] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The water flea Daphnia magna is a small planktonic cladoceran. D. magna has been used as a model species for ecotoxicology, as it is sensitive to environmental stressors and environmental changes. Since Daphnia is affected by culture environment and each population/strain has its own ecological and genetic characteristics, its population/strain-based genome information is useful for environmental genomic studies. In this study, we assembled and characterized the genome of D. magna. Using a high-density genetic map of D. magna xinb3, the draft genome was integrated to 10 linkage groups (LGs). The total length of the integrated genome was about 123 Mb with N50 = 10.1 Mb, and the number of scaffolds was 4193 including 10 LGs. A total of 15,721 genes were annotated after manual curation. Orthologous genes were characterized in the genome and compared with other genomes of Daphnia. In addition, we identified defense related genes such as cytochrome P450 (CYP) genes, glutathione S-transferase (GST) genes, and ATP-binding cassette (ABC) genes from the assembled D. magna genome for its potential use in molecular ecotoxicological studies in the freshwater environment. This genomic resource will be helpful to study for a better understanding on molecular mechanism in response to various pollutants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据