4.7 Article

Comparative study of the immunoprotective effect of two grass carp-sourced Bacillus subtilis spore-based vaccines against grass carp reovirus

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 504, 期 -, 页码 88-95

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.01.055

关键词

Grass carp reovirus; Bacillus subtilis spore; Oral vaccine; Immunoprotection; Immune response

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31725026]
  2. Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China [2018CFA011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Grass carp reovirus II (GCRV II) causes severe haemorrhagic disease with high mortality in grass carp, Cyenopharyngodon idellus. Vaccination is a very effective method in conferring protection against GCRV. In the current study, we constructed two grass carp-sourced Bacillus subtilis spore-based vaccines (GC5-VP4 and GC5NS38) and investigated their potential as oral candidate vaccines against GCRV II. Our results showed that both VP4 and NS38 proteins of GCRV II were efficiently displayed on the spore surface of B. subtilis GC5, and the two recombinant spores stayed in the hindguts of grass carp for antigen presentation. After oral administration, compared with the control groups, both recombinant vaccines GC5-VP4 and GC5-NS38 increased the survival rate of grass carp against GCRV II, with relative percent survival rates of 30% and 36.4%, respectively. Although they had a similar immunoprotective effect, the mechanisms were very different. GC5-VP4 mainly elicited specific antibody responses, both systemic and mucosal, whereas GC5-NS38 mainly elicited an inflammatory response and cellular immunity via expression of major histocompatibility complex molecules. Furthermore, this study demonstrated that the recombinant spores triggered high levels of mucosal immunity and would be promising oral candidate vaccines against GCRV II in grass carp. Combined with previous research, we inferred that vaccine efficacy was not only related to antigen, but also vaccination strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据