4.7 Article

Uncovering carbohydrate metabolism through a genotype-phenotype association study of 56 lactic acid bacteria genomes

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 103, 期 7, 页码 3135-3152

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-019-09701-6

关键词

Carbohydrate metabolism; Genome-wide association study; Genotype-phenotype association study; Lactic acid bacteria; Functional genomics; Microbial genomics

资金

  1. Carlsberg Foundation [CF14-0450]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Owing to their unique potential to ferment carbohydrates, both homo- and heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are widely used in the food industry. Deciphering the genetic basis that determine the LAB fermentation type, and hence carbohydrate utilization, is paramount to optimize LAB industrial processes. Deep sequencing of 24 LAB species and comparison with 32 publicly available genome sequences provided a comparative data set including five major LAB genera for further analysis. Phylogenomic reconstruction confirmed Leuconostoc and Pediococcus species as independently emerging from the Lactobacillus genus, within one of the three phylogenetic clades identified. These clades partially grouped LABs according to their fermentation types, suggesting that some metabolic capabilities were independently acquired during LAB evolution. In order to apply a genome-wide association study (GWAS) at the multigene family level, utilization of 49 carbohydrates was also profiled for these 56 LAB species. GWAS results indicated that obligately heterofermentative species lack 1-phosphofructokinase, required for d-mannose degradation in the homofermentative pathway. Heterofermentative species were found to often contain the araBAD operon, involved in l-arabinose degradation, which is important for heterofermentation. Taken together, our results provide helpful insights into the genetic determinants of LAB carbohydrate metabolism, and opens for further experimental research, aiming at validating the role of these candidate genes for industrial applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据