4.7 Article

Mathematical view with observational/experimental consideration on certain (2+1)-dimensional waves in the cosmic/laboratory dusty plasmas

期刊

APPLIED MATHEMATICS LETTERS
卷 91, 期 -, 页码 165-172

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.aml.2018.11.020

关键词

Waves in cosmic/laboratory dusty plasmas; Symbolic computation; (2+1)-dimensional generalized variable-coefficient; Kadomtsev-Petviashvili-Burgers-type equation; Backlund transformation with solitonic solutions; Observational/experimental supports

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasmas are believed to be possibly the most abundant form of ordinary matter in the Universe, supporting a variety of the wave phenomena, while a dusty plasma is of interest as a non-Hamiltonian system of interacting particles. In this Letter, symbolic computation on an observationally/experimentally-supported (2+1)-dimensional generalized variable-coefficient Kadomtsev-Petviashvili-Burgers-type equation is done, for certain dust-acoustic, electron-acoustic, positron-acoustic, magneto-acoustic, dust-magneto-acoustic, ion-acoustic, dust-ion-acoustic and/or quantum-dust-ion-acoustic waves in one of the cosmic/laboratory dusty plasmas. Auto-Backlund transformation and families of the solitonic solutions are obtained, for the electrostatic wave potential, perturbation of the magnitude of the magnetic field, fluctuation of electron or ion density, or radial-direction component of the velocity of ions or dust particles, relying on such plasma coefficient functions as the nonlinearity, dispersion, dusty-fluid-viscosity/Burgers-dissipation, geometric-effect and diffraction/transverse-perturbation coefficients. Shock structures presented in this Letter are very close to the experimental results previously reported. Future plasma observations/experiments might verify some other effects offered by our analytic results with respect to those plasma coefficient functions. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据