4.8 Article

A practical-oriented NiFe-based water-oxidation catalyst enabled by ambient redox and hydrolysis co-precipitation strategy

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 244, 期 -, 页码 844-852

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.12.021

关键词

Room temperature; Redox and hydrolysis co-precipitation; Ultralow-cost and scalable production; Nickel-iron hydroxide nanoarrays; Water oxidation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21675127]
  2. Shaanxi Provincial Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [2018JC-011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although NiFe-based (oxy)hydroxides have been recognized as the most promising anode materials for industrial water splitting, the existed synthetic methods are difficult to fabricate NiFe-based (oxy)hydroxides simultaneously fulfilling the requirements of low-cost and ambient synthetic process, high performance, and easier realization of large-scale production. In this work, a simple while effective strategy was proposed to fabricate well-aligned Ni-Fe hydroxide nanosheets array on Ni foam (NiFe-OH NS/NF) by the ambient spontaneous redox reaction between Ni foam and Fe3+ and accompanied hydrolysis co-deposition of the generated Ni2+, Fe2+/Fe3+, and OH-. The tailored highly-oriented amorphous and nanoporous nanosheets structure as well as the strong electronic interaction between Ni and Fe species endow this NiFe-OH NS/NF with excellent OER activity that a large current density of 500 mA cm(-2) could be well afforded at a low overpotential of 292 mV. Importantly, the manufacturing and raw-materials cost to synthesize the NiFe-OH NS/NF by this strategy is estimated to be just $0.0165 per cm(2), much lower than those for other reported self-supported Fe-containing catalyst materials. Also, this ambient means not only could be applicable to the large-scale production of size-tunable NiFe-OH NS/NF with stable nanoarray structure, but also could be easily used for the synthesis of NiCo NS/NF and NiCoFe NS/NF for applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据